Maintenance
Court: RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Sunil Kumar Garg CHHOTU SINGH & ANR. Vs. SMT. RAMDINI On 19 March 2002 Law Point: Increased Amount of Maintenance Shall be Taken from the Date of Passing of Order and Not from Date…
Read moreCourt: BOMBAY HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE N.V. Dabholkar, A.B. Naik & N.H. Patil BHAUSAHEB Vs. LEELABAI Decided on 7 July 2003 Law Point: Status of Woman as ‘wife’ not Recognised by Provisions of Act, which Confers Right for Permanent Alimony,…
Read moreCourt: Supreme Court of India Bench: JUSTICE Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & Altamas Kabir RUMA CHAKRABORTY Vs. SUDHA RANI BANERJEE & ANR. Law Point: Wife Cannot Claim to be Directly Interested in Tenanted Suit Premises by way of her entitlement towards…
Read moreCourt: PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE V.K. Bali JAIVIR Vs. SANTOSH On 14 February 1995 Law Point: Default in paying maintenance allowance — Warrant of arrest cannot be issued as a matter of first resort — Resort prior…
Read moreCourt: BOMBAY HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE T.K. Chandrashekhara Das SUSHILABAI Vs. RAVAN ELJI PATIL & ANR. On 27.8.1998 Law Point: Once a Consolidated Amount is agreed upon and paid by the Husband, The Wife Cannot Claim Periodical Maintenance. JUDGEMENT This…
Read moreCourt: BOMBAY HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE A.V. Savant & S.S. Parkar BHAGWAN RAOJI DALE Vs. SUSHMA @ NANDA BHAWAN DALE & ANR. Law Point: A wife who has been divorced on the ground of previous RCR decree in favor of…
Read moreCourt: Andhra High Court Equivalent citations: 1990 CriLJ 2506 Bench: JUSTICE D J Raju Jangam Srinivasa Rao vs Jangam Rajeswari And Anr. on 31 March, 1989 Law Point: Maintenance Arrears for 1 year Only JUDGEMENT 1. This is a petition…
Read moreCourt: ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE P.K. Jain MOHD. ISMAIL Vs. SMT. BILQUEES BANO On 8 April 1997 Law Point: Date of payment of maintenance should normally be from the date of order and sufficient reason should be given if…
Read moreCourt: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE S Puranik Ashok Yeshwant Samant vs Smt. Suparna Ashok Samant On 27 July, 1990 Law Point: Recovery Under 125(3) are Independent of 127, Thus Husband Cannot be Directed to Deposit the Arrears as Condition…
Read moreCourt: Calcutta High Court Equivalent citations: AIR 1987 Cal 153, 90 CWN 1060 Bench: A M Bhattacharjee, S Chakravarty Ashit Mukherjee vs Smt. Susmita Mukherjee (Nee Roy) … on 13 May, 1986 Law Point: Maintenance Pendente Lite- Income of Parties-…
Read more